The Problem: Having to write letters of recommendation for
      people with very dubious qualifications can cause serious legal troubles
      in a time when laws have eroded the confidentiality of business letters.
      In most states, job applicants have the right to read the letters of
      recommendation and can even file suit against the writer if the contents
      are negative.
      The Solution: Here is an arsenal of statements that can be
      read two ways. You are able to state a negative opinion of the
      ex-employee's poor work habits, while allowing the ex-employee to believe
      that it is high praise. When the writer uses these, whether perceived
      correctly or not by the ex-employee, the phrases are virtually
      litigation-proof.
      To describe a person who is extremely lazy: "In my
      opinion," you say as sincerely as you can manage, "you will be
      very fortunate to get this person to work for you." To describe a
      person who is totally inept: "I most enthusiastically recommend this
      candidate with no qualifications whatsoever."
      To describe an ex-employee who had problems getting along
      with fellow workers: "I am pleased to say that this candidate is a
      former colleague of mine."
      To describe a candidate who is so unproductive that the
      job would be better left unfilled: "I can assure you that no person
      would be better for the job."
      To describe a job applicant who is not worth further
      consideration: "I would urge you to waste no time in making this
      candidate an offer of employment."
      To describe a person with lackluster credentials:
      "All in all, I cannot say enough good things about this candidate or
      recommend him too highly."